Elections and Their Market Impact
United States: Presidential Elections
Historical Trends and Myths US elections are perennially anticipated as market-moving events. However, contrary to popular belief—and persistent financial media narratives—data demonstrates that while short-term volatility rises pre- and post-election, especially in closely contested races or when policies are expected to shift, long-term return differentials based solely on political outcomes are minimal.
From 1928 through 2023, the S&P 500 averaged a robust annual return of roughly 11.0% during presidential election years, just fractionally below the average for non-election years. Temporary selloffs often correspond to exogenous shocks (Great Depression, world wars, financial crises), not the elections themselves.
Sectoral and Policy Effects
Sector Rotation: Markets may react sharply at a sectoral level around expectations (e.g., fossil fuels vs. renewables, healthcare reform, defense spending, tariffs).
Taxation and Regulation: Anticipation or implementation of tax changes (e.g., the Tax Cut & Jobs Act, or capital gains proposals) leads to rapid repricing in sectors most affected, with spillover into broader asset classes—bonds, high-yield credit, and REITs.
Trade and Foreign Policy: Tariffs on China (and to a lesser extent, the EU and Mexico) during Trump’s first term and continued by Biden (and now, again, Trump in his subsequent campaign) delivered direct pressure on export-reliant sectors.
2024 in Focus The 2024 presidential cycle epitomizes the modern interplay of electoral uncertainty and markets. President Biden’s withdrawal, a hyper-competitive race between Kamala Harris and Donald Trump, and leaks about drastic tariff hikes all contributed to spiking volatility mid-summer and in the run-up to November, yet the overall S&P 500 trend remained positive, buffered by earnings growth and subsiding inflation.
Investor Behavior
Hedging and Risk-Off Trading: The VIX index (the “fear gauge”) has historically spiked around major political inflection points, as investors hedge via options or shift to low-beta sectors.
Behavioral Traps: There exists a notable tendency toward “risk-of overreaction,” with many retail investors and some institutions making procyclical, emotion-driven allocation changes based on polling swings or policy rumors, rather than fundamentals—behavioral finance refers to this as the “disposition effect,” and it is shown to result in suboptimal long-term outcomes.
Rebalancing After Results: Once results are known, markets often rebound (unless accompanied by shocks such as contested outcomes or dramatic policy shifts), and investors typically reallocate into previously neglected risk assets, sometimes missing the best days.
Case Study: S&P 500 Post-Election Performance (Past 5 Elections)
| Presidential Term | S&P 500 Return Post-Election (1 year) | 4-Year Term Return | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| G. W. Bush (2004) | +7.4% | -32% | Global Financial Crisis ends second term |
| B. Obama (2008) | +4.1% | +85% | Massive policy stimulus after GFC |
| B. Obama (2012) | +24% | +53% | Record S&P rallies following crisis recovery |
| D. Trump (2016) | +21% | +70% | Tax cuts, deregulation, prepandemic bull run |
| J. Biden (2020) | +38% | +48% (by late 2024) | Stimulus, recovery from COVID, high volatility |
Sources: TheStreet, U.S. Bank, CNBC
Global Perspective: Elections in the UK, India, and Emerging Markets
UK Elections and Brexit Referendum The 2016 Brexit vote was arguably the most significant UK political disruption of the past century, precipitating a historic drop in the British pound, immediate global stock selloffs, and persistent volatility in both UK and pan-European equities. The FTSE 250 (domestically focused) saw a 7.2% crash, and the FTSE 100 declined 3.2%—though due to international earnings, the FTSE 100 rebounded faster as a weak pound buoyed overseas profits. Sectors like financial services (loss of EU passporting), automotives, and retail suffered lasting headwinds. Over the ensuing years, market volatility and investment flows were consistently higher than during typical election cycles, reflecting enduring uncertainty over the post-Brexit trading and regulatory regime.
Indian General Elections Indian markets routinely witness pre- and post-election rallies or volatility spikes. For example, ahead of the 2014 and 2019 elections, the BSE Sensex rallied strongly on expectations of business-friendly leadership, while post-election rallies were further bolstered by reform optimism. Elections can trigger both fund inflows (when outcomes are clear/stable) and outflows (when results are indecisive or coalition-driven). However, over the medium and long term, Indian equities have recovered strongly regardless of outcome, as macro trends and earnings growth trump political noise. Sectorally, infrastructure, financials, consumption, and IT often lead gains under pro-growth governments.
Behavioral Note Emerging market investors, particularly global funds, frequently reduce risk exposures ahead of votes but re-enter rapidly post-result if policy continuity or certainty is perceived. Short-term selloffs thus often constitute opportunities for disciplined investors with sound research and risk management.
Comments
Post a Comment